PRIMEFACE VS ICEFACES VS RICHFACES HOW TO
PRIMEFACE VS ICEFACES VS RICHFACES CODE

See following example to differentiate between the page forward and page redirect. In this case, you can use “ form-action” element to differentiate the two navigation cases.īy default, JSF performs a server page forward while navigating to another page.

In JSF navigation rule, you may encounter a situation where two separate actions return a same “ outcome” in a page.

JSF “form-action” navigation rule example.

JSF 2 comes with a very flexible conditional navigation rule to solve the complex page navigation flow. Now, JSF 2 come out a new “auto view page resolver” mechanism named “implicit navigation“, where you don’t need to declare the above navigation rule, instead, just put the “view name” in the action attribute and JSF will find the correct “view page” automatically. In JSF 2.0, a new annotation is used to dependency injection (DI) a managed bean into the property of another managed bean. The managed bean can be a normal Java bean, which contains the getter and setter methods, business logic or even a backing bean (a bean contains all the HTML form value). In JSF 2.0, Java bean that can be accessed from JSF page is called Managed Bean. Later, you can reference this “library” with JSF tag’s library attribute.Ībout managed bean configuration and injection in JSF 2.0 In JSF 2.0 terminology, all the sub-folder name of the “resources” folder is considered as a “library” in JSF 2.0 web application. In JSF 2.0, all your resources files like css, images or JavaScript, should put into a “resources” folder in the root of your web application.

PRIMEFACE VS ICEFACES VS RICHFACES HOW TO

Here’s a quick guide to show how to enable the JSF 2.0 features in Eclipse projects.

How to make Eclipse IDE supports JSF 2.0.

In this tutorial, you will restructure the last JSF 2.0 hello world example, so that, when the button is clicked, it will make an Ajax request instead of submitting the whole form. In JSF 2.0, coding Ajax has been just like coding a normal HTML tag, it’s extremely easy. Let you have a quick idea about how JSF 2.0 look like, and also how it differs from JSF 1.x. In this tutorial, it provides many step by step examples and explanations on using JavaServer Faces (JSF) 2.0 framework.Ī JavaServer Faces (JSF) 2.0 hello world example, shows the JSF 2.0 dependencies, basic annotations and configurations. Unlike JSF 1.x, almost everything is declared in faces-config.xml, with JSF 2.0, you are allowed to use annotation to declare navigating, managed bean or CDI bean, which make your development easier and faster. Lastly, the 'automatic AJAX' server-side DOM diff in ICEfaces can create performance issues server-side if your pages get big - most of the time you know what you want to refresh, and explicitly specifying update='id' on a component is more effective.JavaServer Faces (JSF) 2.0, is an MVC web framework which focus on simplifies building user interfaces (comes with 100+ ready UI tags) for Java web application and make reusable UI component easy to implement.

PRIMEFACE VS ICEFACES VS RICHFACES CODE

In PrimeFaces, thanks to 'widgetVar', you can bind the component to a client-side variable accessible in jQuery and regular DHTML events.įurther, the PrimeFaces components handle many of the common cases with less code for example, a dialog component includes the title bar and the 'X' to close, while in ICEfaces you have to roll your own for that (or buy the EE with composite components). In ICEfaces, you need a server-side round trip and a managed bean property + action listener to open a dialog. I've used both ICEfaces and PrimeFaces and prefer PrimeFaces for two main reasons: development efficiency and UI performance/responsiveness.

Primeface vs icefaces vs richfaces